By judgment No. 4943\/2026, published on 22 June 2026, the Council of State ruled on the question of the dies a quo<\/em> of the time limit for challenging administrative measures, with particular reference to public procurement award procedures.<\/p>\n In particular, in the judgment under examination, the Council of State aligns itself with the line of case law according to which, for the purposes of the running of the time limit for challenging an administrative measure, it is not sufficient that the measure itself has produced a prejudicial effect in the legal sphere of the appellant; it is instead necessary that the interested party has had actual knowledge \u2014 or the ability to become aware \u2014 of the defect of legality that it intends to assert before the courts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Council of State: the running of the time limit for […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":124,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[71],"tags":[],"crccd-news":[160],"class_list":["post-5776","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-crccd-news","crccd-news-administrative-competition-law"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n